VS
We compared two 8-core processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (with Adreno 619 graphics) and MediaTek Dimensity 6020 (Mali-G57 MP2). Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs, and comprehensive tests in benchmarks, like AnTuTu and Geekbench.
- Review
- Differences
- Benchmarks
- AnTuTu v10
- GeekBench 6
- Gaming
- Specs
- Comments (2)
Review
General comparison of performance, power consumption, and other indicators
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Snapdragon 695
31
Dimensity 6020
30
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulkan
Snapdragon 695
24
Dimensity 6020
19
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Snapdragon 695
88
Dimensity 6020
85
NanoReview Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 6020
37
Key Differences
Main differences and advantages of each chip
Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
- Performs 2x better in floating-point computations
- Has a smaller size transistor (6 versus 7 nm)
- Shows better (up to 5%) AnTuTu 10 score – 439K vs 419K
Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 6020
- Announced 1-year and 5-months later
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarks
SoC:
Snapdragon 695
vs
Dimensity 6020
AnTuTu 10
The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios
Snapdragon 695+5%
439724
Dimensity 6020
419634
| CPU | 155778 | 135260 |
| GPU | 81807 | 61988 |
| Memory | 96142 | 115742 |
| UX | 107004 | 109947 |
| Total score | 439724 | 419634 |
GeekBench 6
The GeekBench test shows raw single-threaded and multithreaded CPU performance
Single-Core Score
Snapdragon 695+24%
908
Dimensity 6020
731
Multi-Core Score
Snapdragon 695+11%
2116
Dimensity 6020
1909
| Asset compression | 106.3 MB/sec | 94.1 MB/sec |
| HTML 5 Browser | 58.3 pages/sec | 51.6 pages/sec |
| PDF Renderer | 79.4 Mpixels/sec | 66.5 Mpixels/sec |
| Image detection | 43.4 images/sec | 37.1 images/sec |
| HDR | 68.1 Mpixels/sec | 58.8 Mpixels/sec |
| Background blur | 6.37 images/sec | 4.95 images/sec |
| Photo processing | 20.9 images/sec | 19.3 images/sec |
| Ray tracing | 2.86 Mpixels/sec | 2.53 Mpixels/sec |
Compute Score (GPU)
Snapdragon 695
1223
Dimensity 6020+4%
1275
Promotion
3DMark
A cross-platform benchmark that assesses graphics performance in Vulkan (Metal)
3DMark Wild Life Performance
Snapdragon 695
1199
Dimensity 6020
n/a
| Stability | 99% | - |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | - |
| Score | 1199 | - |
Gaming
Table of average FPS and graphics settings in mobile games
| PUBG Mobile | 66 FPS [Low] | - |
| Call of Duty: Mobile | 60 FPS [Low] | - |
| Fortnite | 24 FPS [Low] | - |
| Shadowgun Legends | 67 FPS [Low] | - |
| World of Tanks Blitz | 57 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Genshin Impact | 19 FPS [Low] | - |
| Mobile Legends: Bang Bang | 42 FPS [Ultra] | - |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 1080 x 2400 | - |
We provide average results. FPS may differ, depending on game version, OS and other factors.
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Snapdragon 695 and Dimensity 6020
CPU
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78) 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55) | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | - | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | - | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | - | 2 MB |
| Process | 6 nanometers | 7 nanometers |
| TDP | 4 W | 6 W |
| Manufacturing | TSMC | TSMC |
Graphics
| GPU name | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 2 |
| Shading units | 128 | 64 |
| Total shaders | 256 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 486.4 Gigaflops | 243.2 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12.1 | - |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17 Gbit/s | 17.07 Gbit/s |
| Max size | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | Hexagon 686 | Yes |
| Storage type | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 1K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video playback | 1080p at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X51 | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 Mbps | Up to 2770 Mbps |
| Upload speed | Up to 1500 Mbps | Up to 1250 Mbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC |
Info
| Announced | October 2021 | March 2023 |
| Class | Mid range | Mid range |
| Model number | SM6375 | MT6833 |
| Official page | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 official site | MediaTek Dimensity 6020 official site |
Cast your vote
So, which SoC would you choose?
2014 (53.2%)
1769 (46.8%)
Total votes: 3783
Related Comparisons
1. Snapdragon 695 or Helio G99
2. Snapdragon 695 or Dimensity 920
3. Snapdragon 695 or Snapdragon 778G
4. Snapdragon 695 or Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
5. Snapdragon 695 or Snapdragon 732G
6. Dimensity 6020 or Snapdragon 778G
7. Dimensity 6020 or Dimensity 1080
8. Dimensity 6020 or Dimensity 700
9. Dimensity 6020 or Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
10. Dimensity 6020 or Exynos 1330
Comments
Please give your opinion on the comparison of Dimensity 6020 and Snapdragon 695, or ask any questions
Dhairya Wadhwani11 February 2024 07:23
Although the 695 model may be slightly superior, Dimensity is greatly underrated compared to it, particularly given the 695's current bad reputation from being overused by companies. This allows you to secure better deals on DM6020 phones, while compromising minimally.
0Reply
Ahmad15 August 2023 17:47
Why are people voting for 6020? 695 has better antutu scores and better CPU and gpu.
+440Reply
Hemanth25 December 2023 07:17
The 6020 is more budget-friendly and involves very few compromises when compared to the 695.
+53Reply
Narayan Sharma30 January 2024 05:48
Hemanth, In the early era, Dimensity was used for testing only. Snapdragon met all qualifications early on. At that time, it was known as Qualcomm Snapdragon.Throughout time, Qualcomm has been the best all-rounder. However, currently, some processors excel in Dimensity.
+8Reply
Promotion
